LIC MF Technology Fund Direct Growth

Very High Risk
Launch date20 Feb 2026
Allotment date13 Mar 2026
End date06 Mar 2026
NAV₹10.00

Expense ratio, exit load and tax

Expense ratio: NA

Inclusive of GST

Exit load

Exit Load for units in excess of 12% of the investment,1% will be charged for redemption within 90 days.

Stamp duty

0.005% (from July 1st, 2020)

Tax implication

NA

Understand terms

Minimum investment amounts

Min. for 1st investment₹1,000
Min. for 2nd investment onwards₹1,000
Min. for SIP₹200

Fund management

Karan Doshi
Feb 2026 - Present
View details

Jaiprakash Toshniwal
Feb 2026 - Present
View details

Education
Mr. Toshniwal is a CFA - CFA Institute, USA. MS Finance (CFA) - ICFAI, India. B.com - Gujarat University.
Experience
Prior to joining LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Ltd., he has worked with India First Life Insurance and Taurus Mutual Fund.
Also manages these schemes

Fund house & investment objective

Rank (total assets)#20 in India
Total AUM₹44,738.19Cr
Date of Incorporation20 Apr 1994

LIC MF Technology Fund Direct Growth is a NA Mutual Fund Scheme launched by LIC Mutual Fund. This scheme was made available to investors on 20 Apr 1994. Karan Doshi is the Current Fund Manager of LIC MF Technology Fund Direct Growth fund. The fund currently has an Asset Under Management(AUM) of ₹44,738 Cr and the Latest NAV as of 20 Feb 2026 is ₹10.00. The LIC MF Technology Fund Direct Growth is rated Very High risk. Minimum SIP Investment is set to ₹200. Minimum Lumpsum Investment is ₹1,000. Exit Load for units in excess of 12% of the investment,1% will be charged for redemption within 90 days. ;

Investment Objective

The scheme seeks to achieve long term capital appreciation by predominantly investing in equity and equity related instruments of technology & technology-related companies. ;

Fund benchmarkBSE Teck Total Return Index

Fund house contact details

Address
Industrial Assurance BuildingGround Floor, Opp. Churchgate Station Mumbai 400020
Phone
022-66016177 / 022-66016178
Launch Date
20 Apr 1994

Peer Comparison