Elections in India have far-reaching consequences, affecting not only the political landscape but also the stock market and the economy.
From Dalal Street to the common labourer, everyone experiences a sense of unease during election periods.
But just how much influence does a ruling party have on the future of India's market?
Political transitions can trigger changes in government policies, economic priorities, and regulations, consequently affecting various sectors and companies.
While elections bring with them volatility in the short term, the long-term effects are primarily determined by the economic reforms and policies implemented by the ruling party. To better comprehend this relationship, it is crucial to analyse historical examples.
In this blog, we will delve into historical data to explore the impact of elections on the Indian market and economy, shedding light on the importance of policy continuity, economic reforms, and stability for sustainable growth.
The following charts out some of the impacts of elections on the Indian economy:
In 1989, controversy surrounded the Indian government under Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, leading to a united opposition forming the National Front coalition.
This political change significantly impacted the stock market and economy, resulting in increased volatility and economic fluctuations.
Despite subsequent reforms and anti-corruption measures by the new government, the election aftermath disrupted the market and the overall economy.
The assassination of PM Rajiv Gandhi in 1991 further exacerbated the market volatility of those times.
The economy suffered hugely from a high gross fiscal deficit, inflation, and limited forex reserves. However, under Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao's leadership, the Congress party regained market confidence by implementing reforms, liberalising the economy, and attracting global investors.
These measures stimulated economic growth and initiated a positive trend in the stock market.
The years 1996-1998 were marked by political instability and the impact of the Asian Financial Crisis.
With three different prime ministers and a lack of stability, market confidence dwindled, adversely affecting the Indian rupee and export-oriented industries.
The election victory of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) in 1999, led by Atal Bihari Vajpayee, brought a sense of stability to the market.
As the results were within the expectations of the market, the Sensex rallied about 7% and continued the upward trend for the next three months. As a result, the GDP growth rate reached around 6-7%.
The government's focus on fiscal discipline and economic stability further restored investor confidence, leading to a positive trend in the stock market and increased foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows.
The government's focus on structural reforms, sector liberalisation, and attracting foreign investment revitalised the economy, resulting in increased GDP growth, controlled inflation, and favourable market performance.
However, within the next two years, it fell by around 50% due to domestic and global factors such as the 9/11 terrorist attack. As a result, at the end of the NDA government’s tenure, the annual compounded return was just 3%, and the absolute performance was over 14%.
After the 2004 election results, the market lost 15% in 2-3 trading sessions as the results were not according to market expectations.
Congress returned to power, while the market had expected the NDA to form the government. After the initial disappointment, the market went into a bull rally that lasted till late 2007, accompanied by a robust GDP growth rate of around 8% and record-high foreign direct investment of $34 billion in 2007.
However, the global financial crisis of 2008 brought an end to the bull market. But the market started recovering in 2009, by the time India went to the polls.
In 2009, UPA came back to power.
The market gained 17% in a single day. But as the second tenure of the UPA government was marked by a series of scams, the market remained choppy.
The decline in investor confidence during the UPA government's second term adversely impacted domestic and foreign investments, leading to reduced capital inflows.
Uncertainty surrounding policies and regulatory stability further hampered investment decisions and economic growth. Additionally, the UPA government struggled with managing fiscal deficits and controlling inflation, creating an unfavourable economic environment.
These factors, combined with the impact of the global financial crisis of 2008, resulted in an economic slowdown and increased volatility.
Even though confidence in the government was low, the Sensex managed to gain 15.5% during the first three years.
When the NDA returned to power again with a full majority in 2014, the market experienced a significant boost in investor sentiment.
The reduced volatility, with the market's standard deviation dropping to 9.1% from 17.96%, indicated a more stable trading environment. The stock market also witnessed a substantial rally, reaching record highs.
The primary reason behind this positive market response was the expectation of economic reforms and the anticipation of a stable government under the NDA. However, it's important to note that the stock market's growth rate during the subsequent four years was around 40%, which some analysts considered relatively slow given the NDA's majority status.
Several factors, including global conditions like high oil prices and a weakening Indian rupee, may have contributed to the perceived slower growth.
Nevertheless, the overall impact of the NDA government's policies and market sentiment was instrumental in driving the initial market euphoria, reduced volatility, and record-high levels of the stock market.
During the 2019 election period in India, the stock market exhibited a notable correlation with the political landscape. As the election approached, investors closely monitored the political developments and their potential impact on the economy.
The stock market experienced periods of volatility, with fluctuations in response to election-related news and expectations. However, the outcome of the election, which resulted in a decisive victory for the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the re-election of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, was met with a positive market response, as it provided a sense of stability and continuity for investors.
Post-election, the market witnessed a significant upswing, with several key stock indices reaching record highs. This rally was attributed to the expectations of continued economic reforms and policy continuity under the BJP government.
The government's pro-business stance and emphasis on initiatives such as "Make in India" and infrastructure development were seen as favourable for the market. Additionally, the ease of doing business, tax reforms, and efforts to attract foreign investment were viewed positively by investors.
However, some exogenic and endogenic factors did not allow for the full realisation of this growth. These include global trade tensions, structural issues in critical sectors, and challenges in the banking sector.
In the 2024 elections, Narendra Modi was re-elected as Prime Minister for a third term, but the BJP did not secure an absolute majority, leading to a market decline after a prolonged bull market. Fund managers predicted delays in political decisions and a slower pace of government action due to the coalition.
Some believe the BJP's pro-growth agenda will continue, while others think that the coalition might slow down reforms.
Before the election, the net profit of the Indian banking sector surpassed $35.9 billion at the end of April 2024 for the first time. During the election, Indian equities saw their worst day in 4 years, dropping 6% after exit polls showed no absolute majority for the BJP.
The Indian stock market surpassed the $5 trillion mark, reflecting strong performance, but faced short-term instability. Furthermore, selective investment in sectors like manufacturing, financial services and real estate is expected to benefit from this growth cycle.
Let us now look at the performance of the Sensex in the past five Lok Sabha election periods to gauge how the markets moved three months before and three months after the elections.
Voting Phase |
Sensex Points 3 Months Before Election |
Sensex Points 3 Months After Election |
Difference |
September 5 - October 3, 1999 |
4,141 |
5,005 |
864 |
April 20 - May 10, 2004 |
5,591 |
5,192 |
-399 |
April 16 - May 13, 2009 |
9,709 |
15,667 |
5,958 |
April 7 - May 12, 2014 |
22,386 |
26,638 |
4,252 |
April 11 - May 19, 2019 |
38,673 |
37,332 |
-1,341 |
April 19 - June 1, 2024 |
72,488.99 |
76,468.78 |
3,979.79 |
Voting Phase |
Nifty Points 3 Months Before Election |
Nifty Points 3 Months After Election |
Difference |
September 5 - October 3, 1999 |
1,374.95 |
1,372.30 |
-2.65 |
April 20 - May 10, 2004 |
1,844.05 |
1,699.45 |
-144.6 |
April 16 - May 13, 2009 |
3,484.15 |
3,593.45 |
109.35 |
April 7 - May 12, 2014 |
6,694.35 |
7,108.75 |
414.4 |
April 11 - May 19, 2019 |
11,584.30 |
11,828.25 |
243.95 |
April 19 - June 1, 2024 |
21,995.85 |
23,263.90 |
1268.05 |
The following are the trends that emerged six months after the election results:
Year |
Part in Power |
Consequence (After Six Months) |
2004 |
UPA (United Progressive Alliance) |
The Sensex shot up by 13 percentage points after the public viewed Dr Manmohan Singh and P Chidambaram as reform-friendly. |
2009 |
UPA (United Progressive Alliance) |
The Sensex remained nearly unchanged, with no significant policy change compared to UPA-1. |
2014 |
NDA (National Democratic Alliance) |
Policy reforms the Modi government undertook at the initial stage, such as fiscal consolidation and curbing inflation, drove up the Sensex by nine percentage points. |
2019 |
NDA (National Democratic Alliance) |
A decline in the GDP growth rate and subdued market performance were due to the global economic and domestic consumption slowdown. |
An analysis of the impact of elections on the Indian market and economy reveals that while short-term volatility is inevitable during election periods, the long-term trajectory is determined by the government's policy actions and its ability to foster a conducive business environment.
The stability of the government, whether in the form of a majority or a coalition, plays a crucial role in instilling confidence among investors. Moreover, the historical trends highlight the importance of policy continuity and economic reforms in driving market performance.
While elections introduce volatility, the focus should be on the government's ability to provide stability and implement effective measures for sustainable economic growth. Ultimately, informed investment decision-making should consider the broader economic landscape and reforms rather than being solely influenced by election outcomes.