Compare SBI Gold Direct Plan Growth vs Nippon India Gold Savings Fund Direct Growth

Compare FundsDetailed comparison on parameters like NAV | Returns | Risk | Rating | Analysis
SBI Gold Direct Plan GrowthOther
FoF Overseas/Domestic
4.0
INVEST NOW
Nippon India Gold Savings Fund Direct GrowthOther
FoF Overseas/Domestic
2.0
INVEST NOW
Add a fund

SBI Gold Direct Plan Growth

(22.3%)

Nippon India Gold Savings Fund Direct Growth

(21.6%)

Fund Details

Risk	High	High	-
Min SIP Amount	₹500	₹100	-
Expense Ratio	0.10%	0.13%	-
NAV	₹23.0 (19-Apr-2024)	₹30.1 (19-Apr-2024)	-
Fund Started	01-Jan-2013	31-Dec-2012	-
Fund Size	₹1,604Cr	₹1,709Cr	-
Exit Load	Exit load of 1% if redeemed within 15 days.	Exit load of 1%, if redeemed within 15 days	-

Returns

1Y
22.3%
21.6%
-
3Y
14.7%
14.3%
-
5Y
17.7%
17.3%
-

Pros & Cons

Pros
1. Consistently higher annualised returns than category average for the past 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and 10Y2. Lower expense ratio: 0.1%3. Consistently top ranked fund
1. 1Y and 5Y annualised returns higher than category average2. Lower expense ratio: 0.13%3. 1Y category rank: 4
-

Cons
1. Lower alpha: -0.32
The fund has generated returns lower than benchmark - Domestic Price of Gold - in the last 3Y 
1. Lower alpha: -0.35
The fund has generated returns lower than benchmark - Domestic Price of Gold Index - in the last 3Y 2. Low rating: 23. 3Y and 10Y annualised returns lower than category average
-

Holding Analysis

Top 5
-
-
-
Top 20
-
-
-
P/E
-
-
-
P/B
-
-
-
Turnover
-
-
-
Equity
-
-
-
Cash
-
-
-

Top Holdings

Top 10 Holdings
Name
Assets
SBI Gold ETF
100.0%
Name
Assets
Nippon India ETF Gold BeES
100.0%
-

Fund Manager

Name
Raviprakash Sharma
Himanshu Mange
-
Education
Mr. Sharma is a B.Com (H), Chartered Accountant and CFA (USA).
Mr. Mange has done B.Com and CA
-
Experience
Prior to joining SBI AMC he has worked with HDFC AMC, Citigroup Wealth Advisors India Pvt. Ltd, Kotak Securities, Times Investors Services Pvt. Ltd. and Birla Sun Life Securities.
Prior to joining Nippon India MF, he has worked with Tata AIA Life Insurance, Pipalia Singhal & Associates, Felix Solutions, Lodha Group and N.B.Gandhi & Co.
-

About Fund

Description
SBI Mutual Fund started their mutual fund on 29/06/1987 and its managing total assets of ₹1,88,455 Cr. Its ranked at 5 as per total assets at end of 30th Sep 2017.
Reliance Mutual Fund started their mutual fund on 30/06/1995 and its managing total assets of ₹2,32,169 Cr. Its ranked at 3 as per total assets at end of 30th Sep 2017.
-
Launch Date
29 Jun 1987
30 Jun 1995
-
Custodian
SBI SG Global Securities Services Pvt.Ltd.
Deutsche Bank
-
Registrar & Transfer Agent
Cams
KFin Tech
-

Popular Comparisons

Motilal Oswal Multicap 35 Fund - Direct - Growth
Vs
SBI Flexicap Fund Direct Growth
Axis Bluechip Fund - Direct - Growth
Vs
SBI Bluechip Fund - Direct - Growth
HDFC Small Cap Fund - Direct - Growth
Vs
HSBC Small Cap Fund Direct Growth

Vaishnavi Tech Park, 3rd & 4th Floor
Sarjapur Main Road, Bellandur
Bengaluru – 560103
Contact Us
PRODUCTS
StocksFutures & OptionsIPOMutual FundsCreditBill Payments
GROWW
About UsPricingBlogMedia & PressCareersHelp and SupportTrust and Safety
QUICK LINKS
AMC Mutual FundsCalculatorsGlossaryOpen Demat AccountGroww DigestSitemapIncome Tax Calculator
ⓒ 2016-2024 Groww. All rights reserved, Built with ♥in India

Compare Funds

Detailed comparison on parameters like NAV | Returns | Risk | Rating | Analysis

SBI Gold Direct Plan Growth

Nippon India Gold Savings Fund Direct Growth

Add a fund

SBI Gold Direct Plan Growth

Nippon India Gold Savings Fund Direct Growth

1. Consistently higher annualised returns than category average for the past 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and 10Y

2. Lower expense ratio: 0.1%

3. Consistently top ranked fund

1. 1Y and 5Y annualised returns higher than category average

2. Lower expense ratio: 0.13%

3. 1Y category rank: 4

1. Lower alpha: -0.32 The fund has generated returns lower than benchmark - Domestic Price of Gold - in the last 3Y

1. Lower alpha: -0.35 The fund has generated returns lower than benchmark - Domestic Price of Gold Index - in the last 3Y

2. Low rating: 2

3. 3Y and 10Y annualised returns lower than category average

Holding Analysis

Top Holdings

Popular Comparisons